- 积分
- 4653
注册时间2004-3-7
参与分
技术分
精华
该用户从未签到
|
楼主 |
发表于 2006-3-6 21:20
|
显示全部楼层
我的看法
2005年5月5日
千言万语不如看个图
这几个图是俺从一本叫做< Messer Magazine >的德国杂志上转贴来的,它们是该杂志最近一期的热门.(04年4月到5月刊)
如今,咱这德国杂志似已不如当年那般痛快了,而俺也确实知道了俺的艾默森刀子在该杂志所做的整个刀具系列测试中表现并不是最好的. 俺相信,俺的刀子在部件的适配性以及表面处理方面比其它一些刀要差点儿事,握持性表现不错,8过其它方面则让俺不太理解咧!
然而,艾默生指挥官总算没断,并且在与其它几个厂的量产刀的较量中挺了过来,俺认为哥伦比亚河的刀子表现是最好的.(PS.听到这是俺送给盲目迷信者们一记响亮的耳光么?)
测试过程中,有一把刀早早就夭了,以致于它无法再进入剩下的测试环节唉.从图中很容易看出来它是谁啦.
俺转贴介几张图原因诸多,您知道明显的原因(这跟俺有关嘛),但最重要的原因是,介个测试是随机的,无偏的,独立的,没有宣传目的的.(很合俺胃口的)
对于艾默生刀子,俺们自己是天天在测试的,测锁,测刃,等等(当然还有侧漏).如果你们买俺的刀刀,俺就会给你们一个保证(纸片),俺做的刀显然是不可破坏的,而俺的那些个竞争者们则很软弱和娘儿们气.俺才不进行那什么品牌对比性测试的干活,第1,因为那样是缺乏职业道德的,(俺不屑和俺的竞争者们为伍),第2,俺不拿自个儿的刀刀和别人的刀刀比划,没干过,以后也不干,第3,所有关起门来自个儿搞品牌对比测试的都有自吹之嫌. (废鸡巴话!)
俺的刀刀已经得到了白沙实验室的测试,为的是有资格入选米国宇航局飞行计划.(PS,广告:白沙,想飞的感觉).
俺们用管子,锤子,钳子,还有悬浮(!@#%#@%$#%^$….)来测试刀刀的各个方面,以后还要一如既往这么干.哦,介可不是比较哇,俺可没说“俺们的比他们的强”,那么干只8过为了不断地改善.
说到偏见,俺希望您知道那是多么常见的事哇,偏见形成的信息扭曲又是多么误人呀,还他妈的看起来是公正的.(就如同俺经常干的那样)
在此且让俺夸夸其谈一翻,以便得出正确结论嘎~~~~~~~~~~
Say for example there was a folding knife (A) that after you opened it up, you inserted a hardened steel bolt through the handles and blade, then let's say there was a lock back folder (B) that used a real heavy spring and precision lock up system.
Now let's test the lock failure of each knife. The knife (A) with the hardened steel cross pin took 6000 lbs. of pressure to defeat the locking system. The lock back (B) took 3,750 lbs. to defeat.
In testing the blade though, the cross bolt knife (A) blade broke in half at 1100 lbs. of lateral pressure. The lock back blade (B) took 1400 lbs. of lateral pressure before breaking.
Now, (again in theory, for the sake of this point) if I were the manufacturer of the cross pin knife (A) I would advertise the point that my knife beat the lock back in lock strength by 2,250 lbs. i.e.: My knife is better. We'll just conveniently ignore the blade strength deficit.
You could do a hundred such tests and pick only those that support your hypothesis or claim, and further yet, you could seed the field with hand picked "special" samples of both your own and the competitors product, if you chose to and no one would ever know.
Is this unethical? I'll leave that argument up to you. Does this happen? All the time. Every product on the market faces the claims and counterclaims of their competitors. That's business.
In the end though, I'm just going to make these last points.
Always question the integrity, bias or agenda at stake when any manufacturer claims or publishes their own in-house test data. Again, the results may be actual, but the choice of categories and selected data may be completely skewed in favor of the manufacturer. Never take their word for it.
Again, this is the main reason we never publish any of our test results. No one would believe us and I would not expect our customers to take our word on testing procedures, data or results regarding our own products. Every manufacturer will publish data supporting their own hypothesis or product.
Just remember, "Tobacco does not cause cancer." "Nicotine is not addictive."
Ernest R. Emerson
5 May, 2004 |
|
发表于 2006-3-6 21:08
，你在人家地盘贴那样的图当然他要删除了。
发表于 2006-3-7 18:29
